> Did you ever think that Jeff is yanking your chain?
This is a possibility, however I live in Iowa, and we actually _have_
people here that are exactly like him, however the zealots like him are quite a
bit more literate in Iowa. ;o)
> If you were to ask me, I'd guess that Jeff is no more Christian than you
So you suppose he is only doing this to further the atheist cause? He
is being a martyr (given that I forced his hand and actually sent some of his
messages to his ISP's abuse department) and is really a learned, and highly
educated atheist who specifically purchased a webtv unit to "hide in the
fringe"? As you and I both know, there is _very_ little likelihood of _ever_
finding an atheist who chooses to use a stupid-enabled internet appliance.
Atheist ALL own _real_ computers! Remember, the default is religious, atheism
> He's gleefully playing an idiot.
Nobody _gleefully_ plays the idiot, just like the dog that pisses on
the rug, they simply can not help it, it IS what it IS. I think if people like
Jeff had the choice, had the ability to be able to `order themselves' from a
menu of choices, they would almost unanimously check the box marked
"intelligent' rather than the one marked "stupid".
> Look at the facts. He has't one Christian trait, he has no kindness, he
> swears like a banshee, he doesn't have the slightest concept of love, he
> likes mocking people. From a Christian standpoint, those are all the traits
> of the devil.
He behaves exactly like my ex-mother-in-law, a three days a week church
lady. In fact, the Saturday Night Live character played by Dana Carvey, the
Church Lady, mimics Jeff in a very similar, albeit more intelligent way. Note
that some of his messages are horribly misspelled, and some are not. My guess,
some messages he remembers to push the "spell check" button, and some he does
not. Webtv does not offer grammar correction, thus his ignorance shines
through. My perception is that he is, exactly what he pretends to be, a
"church lady" in a repressed homosexual macho form. Christianity is often a
mask worn by evil, most serial killers are christians (as I've pointed out).
> "I played him for a fool."
> He's attempting to discredit Christianity by lying and acting like an idiot
> (not to say it doesn't come naturally to him), saying pseudo-religious
I don't think anyone who was trying to discredit christianity would
have the tenacity he has shown. Even those who are hard-core atheists enough
to become apostles on the website, EVENTUALLY GIVE UP, and quit. In the past 7
years we have had well over 60 apostles, Timothy is the most current casualty.
The only people zealous enough to do what Jeff does are the truly memetically
infected, the hard-core christians! Thus, I believe he is what he claims to
be. Nobody is as dedicated to atheism to perpetuate as long as Jeff has. Of
course you could ask the question, then why have I done it longer than anyone?
The simple answer is, this is an elaborate performance art project which I
started in order to help a schizophrenic friend (David), and will see to
completion. The other (and economically important) aspect is that I'm working
to keep the hit counts high, thus keep the "real estate value" of the domain
name "antichrist.net" high. It is a valuable domain name, I've received offers
to sell it up to just under $100,000 and as low as $3,000. We want to
eventually take the domain name commercial, but I don't want to risk the
capital investment, thus investors will need proof of the domains
click-through-rate. That's probably the most paramount reason why I am
maintaining this site as I do. :o) That, and it's fun. :o)
> One thing to remind you... He said in his message that he put his name and
> where he lives in his message.
I don't think he created a puzzle for me to solve, I think he is just
being stupid. Note the follow-up message wherein he threatened me with
prosecution should I attempt to find him. This does NOT suggest he was playing
a game, but rather just saying stupid things. I believe since I've mentioned
to him about the embedded signature tag in previous emails, that this was what
he was referring to. I don't for a second believe Jeff created a rebus for me.
> If you look at his messages, he keeps using the word "Superior". I would
> suggest that he lives in Superior, Wisconsin.
You are reading FAR TOO MUCH into it! If you want a rebus to play
with, visit my page (James page) and try to find the hidden secrets there. My
page was truly assembled to be a rebus, and of the millions of visits, so far
only ONE PERSON has ever completed the puzzle, giving me their solution. His
words to me were "That is the coolest thing I've ever seen". End of quote. :o)
> He said, "Believe me my real name and city is in this message I made sure of
> Second, going through the words in that particular message, the word that's
> the most likely to be a last name is "King". "Poor" can also be a last name,
> but it's usually spelled with an e at the end.
King is most often a negro name, rarely a white name. However, his
syntax of "I done proved" denotes he's from the south, possibly Arkansas, so he
could be a white King, just as I've found white Jacksons in the south. :o)
Now to suggest that he is not a negro, note his messages wherein he can be even
more derogatory towards negroes than even I can be. This suggests he is white
> By the way, spouting hate at black people shows to everyone that you've
> fallen into the same pit of "I'm better than you are" that the Christians
> have fallen into. Until you wipe prejudice from yourself, and until you stop
> thinking yourself superior to others, you are just as religious as the
> Christians are, as it's their error.
Obviously you do not live near, or have to deal with negroes. ;o) I
got the same anti-racism message from Samantha, then I looked up her
originating IP address (which I'm about to do with you as well) and it showed
she was from Sydney Australia. THAT is why she can boldly say negroes are not
problematic, SHE DOESN'T HAVE TO LIVE WITH OR DEAL WITH THE SUBHUMAN BEASTS!
There are ZERO african negroes in Australia. Now, let me see where YOU hail
from... (peeking at the received line in your message header...) Phoenix
Arizona. I guess you can be pro-negro living in a town like that. ;o) Move
to Detroit or any of the riot-prone cities such as Cleveland or Los Angeles and
THEN tell me "we are all equal". Here in Iowa, we _would_ be virtually crime
free, if only we didn't have negroes. Negroes being brought in here is a
recent event, part of the multiculturalism experiment the federal government
forced down our throats. Statistics are rarely inaccurate, and there is a
sharp increase in crime which follows exactly the sharp increase in the negro
population. Let's not forget as well watching Cops on TV, the most common
criminal shown is a negro. We also brought in a lot of bosnians, and indians
(from India). These people are wonderful, an Indian couple own the gas station
up the street. WONDERFUL folks, hard working, and very friendly. What role do
the neighborhood negroes play? They rob the gas station. They drive by and
shoot at my office windows at night. They bring a sense of fear to downtown so
that everyone who works late (such as I do) leave their office in fear, and
move quickly to their car as if in a war zone. Just as Gabriel who lives in
South Africa, I too have a reason for saying that I do not _hate_ the negro, no
more than I hate polar bears, I just want them OUT of here and back where they
belong. Negroes belong in Africa just as polar bears belong in the Arctic.
> Their problem is that they wish to put themselves above others, just as you
> do. They use religion, you use IQ. You're both the same, though.
So you believe that a kilo of copper is equal to a kilo of gold. You
don't put values on things. A violent negro `gang banga' is equal in value to
someone such as myself (an embedded application design engineer). Both play
important roles in our society. I design and build research spacecraft
subassemblies, robots and robotic controls for industry and agriculture,
develop embedded software enhancements for existing hardware, and adaptive
technologies for the disabled, while the gang banga sells drugs, and shoot up
our neighborhoods, accidentally killing our children while performing their
seemingly all important drive-by shootings. I guess I can easily see why you
feel _both_ are important to society.